Skip to main content
· 4/3/2000

People v. Rizo

Citations

  • 996 P.2d 27
  • 94 Cal. Rptr. 2d 375
  • 22 Cal. 4th 681
  • 22 Cal. 681
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 3489
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2594
  • 2000 Cal. LEXIS 2070

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \a specific intent crime\ that \focuses solely on the acts and intent of the violator\ may be committed even if the defendant's intent is based on a mistaken understanding
  • stating that a defendant cannot be charged with anything more than attempt if he possesses the “requisite criminal intent,” but the facts are such that an element of the crime is lacking
  • “Nothing in [§ 25-203] prohibits such parties from agreeing to keep their property and their debts separate during marriage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.