California Supreme Court· 4/3/2000

People v. Rizo

Citations

996 P.2d 27
94 Cal. Rptr. 2d 375
22 Cal. 4th 681
22 Cal. 681
2000 Daily Journal DAR 3489
2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2594
2000 Cal. LEXIS 2070

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that \a specific intent crime\ that \focuses solely on the acts and intent of the violator\ may be committed even if the defendant's intent is based on a mistaken understanding
stating that a defendant cannot be charged with anything more than attempt if he possesses the “requisite criminal intent,” but the facts are such that an element of the crime is lacking
“Nothing in [§ 25-203] prohibits such parties from agreeing to keep their property and their debts separate during marriage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

138 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Rizo

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.