United States v. Jose A. Medina-Garcia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing mens rea for transporting provision now in § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii), which requires that the defendant acted “willfully”
• addressing mens rea for transporting provision now in § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii), which requires that the defendant acted “willfully”
• addressing mens rea for transporting provision now in § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii), which requires that the defendant acted “willfully”
• upholding sufficiency of detailed indictment based on practicalities despite arguably incorrect technical word choice
• “The crime of conspiracy is complete upon the agreement to do an unlawful act as implemented by one or more overt acts. Factual impossibility is no defense.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).