People v. Perry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “cannabis 15 possession is prohibited in a number of specific circumstances and its possession or use in penal 16 institutions is excluded from the initiative’s affirmative legalization process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Raybon
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-06-11· cited 50×
• People v. Raybon
  California Supreme Court· 2021-08-12· cited 41×
• People v. Raybon
  California Court of Appeal· 2019-06-11
• People v. Whalum
  California Court of Appeal· 2020-06-08
• People v. Herrera
  California Court of Appeal· 2020-07-31
• People v. Taylor
  California Court of Appeal· 2021-01-22
• All of Us or None etc. v. Hamrick
  California Court of Appeal· 2021-05-26

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Lance W.
  California Supreme Court· 1985-02-01· cited 704×
• People v. Rizo
  California Supreme Court· 2000-04-03· cited 211×
• Wildlife Alive v. Chickering
  California Supreme Court· 1976-08-24· cited 209×
• People v. Briceno
  California Supreme Court· 2004-11-04· cited 182×
• In Re Littlefield
  California Supreme Court· 1993-05-20· cited 123×
• People v. Palaschak
  California Supreme Court· 1995-05-08· cited 61×
• People v. Low
  California Supreme Court· 2010-06-24· cited 58×
• People v. Stringham
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-11-29· cited 36×
• People v. Spann
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-11-25· cited 32×
• People v. Fenton
  California Court of Appeal· 1993-12-01· cited 28×