City of Collinsville v. Seiber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting vagueness challenge because the terms in question were “significantly explained in the context of the ordinance as a whole”
• ordinance declaring nuisance to “permit or maintain an unsightly yard or premises where there is an accumulation or deposit of any vehicle, ... junk, ... waste or earth” held constitutional
• ordinance prohibiting maintaining “‘an unsightly yard or premises where there is an accumulation or deposit of any vehicle, equipment, junk, wrecked or disabled automobile, trucks, material of any nature, waste or earth’ ” not unconstitutionally vague
• ordinance prohibiting maintaining “‘an unsightly yard or premises where there is an accumulation or deposit of any vehicle, equipment, junk, wrecked or disabled automobile, trucks, material of any nature, waste or earth’” not unconstitutionally vague

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).