People v. Ray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• medical licensure statute did not infringe on rights of expression because it was “reasonably drawn to meet the State’s compelling interest in regulation of the practice of medicine”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Rogers
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2002-03-19· cited 31×
• Illinois Municipal League v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-01-21· cited 25×
• People v. Schubert
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-09-10· cited 23×
• Pueblo v. Villafañe Fabián
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1995-10-10· cited 16×
• State v. Ongley
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-06-02· cited 11×
• STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH v. Hinze
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1989-06-16· cited 5×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1982-03-03· cited 3,694×
• Baggett v. Bullitt
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-01· cited 1,188×
• Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar
  Supreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 1,044×
• Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange Cty.
  Supreme Court· 1961-12-11· cited 433×
• Rios v. Jones
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-05-28· cited 74×
• People Ex Rel. Difanis v. Barr
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-12-19· cited 67×
• People v. Vandiver
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1971-12-17· cited 53×
• People v. Blue Mountain Joe
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1889-06-15· cited 25×
• People v. Handzik
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1951-11-27· cited 23×
• People v. Shokunbi
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1967-11-16· cited 4×
• The People v. Zimmerman
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1945-11-21· cited 4×