· 6/2/1994
State v. Ongley
Citations
- 882 P.2d 22
- 118 N.M. 431
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying intermediate scrutiny to a challenge to a criminal statute that did not “restrict[] free expression based on the content of what is expressed”
- applying intermediate scrutiny to a challenge to a criminal statute that did not “restrict}] free expression based on the content of what is expressed”
- applying intermediate scrutiny to a challenge to a criminal statute that did not “restrict[] free expression based on the content of what is expressed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flores, Hartz, Pickard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.