People v. Ray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting police officer to testify as expert on quality and quantity of drugs, based on his training and experience in observing drug use and drug trafficking
• holding that a police officer properly gave expert testimony that the quantity of crack cocaine in the defendant’s possession, the manner the rocks of crack cocaine were evenly cut, and the street value of crack cocaine, indicated that the defendant intended to sell the drugs
• officer qualified as an expert gave his opinion regarding the significance of the quantity and shape of crack cocaine found in defendant’s possession
• discussing police expertise with respect to drug issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Lueth
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2003-02-04· cited 194×
• People v. Williams
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2005-12-27· cited 167×
• People v. Griffin
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1999-07-14· cited 90×
• People v. Stimage
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1993-10-05· cited 59×
• People v. Murray
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1999-05-05· cited 53×
• People v. Caulley
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1992-12-07· cited 50×
• People v. Hubbard
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-03-06· cited 40×
• People v. Williams
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1993-03-02· cited 40×
• People v. Catanzarite
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-06-23· cited 28×
• In re Forfeiture of $275
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1998-01-23

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Beckley
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1990-06-05· cited 182×
• People v. Smith
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1986-05-29· cited 108×
• People v. Foster
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-02-23· cited 37×
• People v. Catania
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1987-04-06· cited 1×