People v. Caulley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the expert’s testimony regarding what was required by law to establish insanity invaded the role of the court
• stating “the defendant must establish that as a result of the intoxicated condition, he was rendered temporarily insane”
• “In this case, the prosecutor erred in questioning his experts about what the law requires for insanity.”
• “[A]n individual who is voluntarily intoxicated does not have grounds for an absolute defense based on his insanity.”
• involuntary intoxication can be caused by the use of prescription medication
• addressing Caulley’s use of the prescribed drug Halcion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).