Skip to main content

People v. Schmidt

Citations

  • 599 N.E.2d 201
  • 233 Ill. App. 3d 512
  • 174 Ill. Dec. 655
  • 1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 1440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court determined the defendant’s request for a fitness evaluation was a delay attributable to the defendant
  • involved an in-custody defendant, 120-day rule (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 38, ¶ 103-5(a))
  • where no delay by defendant within 21 days of end of term, State not entitled to extension under paragraph (f); implying if delay occurs within 21 days of end of period by defendant, then State would be entitled to extension
  • delay caused by crowded dockets is attributable to State
  • delay caused by crowded dockets is attributable to State

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gorman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.