Skip to main content

People v. Phillips

Citations

  • 950 N.E.2d 1126
  • 242 Ill. 2d 189
  • 351 Ill. Dec. 298
  • 2011 Ill. LEXIS 1086

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting section 113-4(e)’s admonishment requirement in light of the warning, regarding trial in absentia, contained on the back of a bail bond slip
  • where statute required that judge warn accused to appear for court, warning on signed bond slip was no substitute
  • question of whether a defendant waived his admonishment rights was an issue of law to be reviewed de novo
  • “[W]hen a trial judge does not admonish a defendant in any way under section 113–4(e
  • there cannot be “substantial compliance” with the Code where the trial judge did not, in any way, admonish the defendant pursuant to section 113-4(e)
  • whether the defendant waived his right to receive section 113-4(e) admonishments was a question of law subject to de novo review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Theis, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.