People v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in the absence of section 113-4(e) admonishment, sentencing in absentia constitutes error requiring a new sentencing hearing
• in the absence of section 113— 4(e) admonishment, sentencing in absentia constitutes error requiring a new sentencing hearing
• abuse of discretion to proceed in defendant’s absence without waiver of right to be present
• abuse of discretion to proceed in defendant's absence without waiver of right to be present
• in the absence of section 113–4(e) admonishment, sentencing in absentia constitutes error requiring a new sentencing hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-05-19· cited 46×
• People v. Phillips
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2011-05-23· cited 32×
• People v. Lawton
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-09-09· cited 30×
• People v. Phillips
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-03-06· cited 30×
• People v. Cobian
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-08-27· cited 8×
• People v. Phillips
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-09-30· cited 7×
• People v. WAKENIGHT
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-07-11· cited 1×
• People v. Phillips
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2011-03-24

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Taylor v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1973-11-05· cited 580×
• People v. Partee
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1988-10-20· cited 136×
• People v. Collins
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-11-04· cited 17×
• People v. Coppage
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-08-14· cited 13×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-09-06· cited 5×