Supreme Court of Colorado· 3/8/1976

People v. Pearson

Citations

546 P.2d 1259
190 Colo. 313
1976 Colo. LEXIS 796

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

affirming trial court’s finding of fact that consent was voluntary when supported by adequate evidence in the record
affirming trial court’s finding of fact that consent was voluntary when supported by adequate evidence in the record
prosecutorial use for impeachment purposes of defendant’s statements to court-appointed psychiatrist does not violate defendant’s privilege to testify or privilege against self-incrimination
prosecutorial use for impeachment purposes of defendant's statements to court-appointed psychiatrist does not violate defendant's privilege to testify or privilege against self-incrimination
where premeditation was not at issue in the trial, failure to instruct properly on premeditation was not reversible error
defendant may procure private psychiatric examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hodges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.