People v. Patrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We . . . stress that we cannot determine the as-applied constitutionality of a statute based upon an 81 incomplete record of the facts.”
• “It is imperative that there be some factual record made by the trial court which states why the evidence . . . causes the statute to be unconstitutional as applied.”
• “We again stress that we cannot determine the as-applied constitutionality of a statute based upon an incomplete record of the facts.”
• \[I]t is imperative that there be some factual record made by the trial court which states why the evidence ... causes the statute to be unconstitutional as applied.\
• incomplete record precluded determination of as-applied constitutionality challenge to a statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Allman
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2012-12-06· cited 249×
• People v. Greer
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2011-04-21· cited 49×
• People v. Devorss
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2011-03-31· cited 35×
• People v. Torres
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-03-19· cited 34×
• People v. DeWitt
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2011-09-15· cited 25×
• People v. Komar
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2015-12-03· cited 1×
• People v. Mountjoy
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2016-06-02· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ohio v. Roberts
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
• People v. Dement
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1983-04-04· cited 87×
• People v. Oliver
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1987-11-02· cited 72×
• People v. Thornburg
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1970-11-30· cited 17×
• People v. Cobbin
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1984-12-17· cited 16×
• People v. McNulty
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1971-02-08· cited 13×