Appellate Court of Illinois· 2/21/1992

People v. Pace

Citations

587 N.E.2d 1257
225 Ill. App. 3d 415
167 Ill. Dec. 642
1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 248

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

distinguishing Lefler and Landry on the basis that they disapproved of photos that depicted the results of the autopsy and not the wounds inflicted during the course of the crime
distinguishing Lefler and Landry on the basis that they disapproved of photos that depicted the results of the autopsy and not the wounds inflicted during the course of the crime
“[c]atch-all arguments in post-trial motions do not preserve unspecified claims of error on appeal”
\[c]atch-all arguments in post-trial motions do not preserve unspecified claims of error on appeal\
after determining that the defendant’s motion for substitution of judge was improperly denied, considering the sufficiency of the evidence in order to determine whether there was a risk of double jeopardy on retrial
after determining that the defendant’s motion for substitution of judge was improperly denied, considering the sufficiency of the evidence in order to determine whether there was a risk of double jeopardy on retrial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Inglis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.