People v. Pace

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Lefler and Landry on the basis that they disapproved of photos that depicted the results of the autopsy and not the wounds inflicted during the course of the crime
• distinguishing Lefler and Landry on the basis that they disapproved of photos that depicted the results of the autopsy and not the wounds inflicted during the course of the crime
• “[c]atch-all arguments in post-trial motions do not preserve unspecified claims of error on appeal”
• \[c]atch-all arguments in post-trial motions do not preserve unspecified claims of error on appeal\
• after determining that the defendant’s motion for substitution of judge was improperly denied, considering the sufficiency of the evidence in order to determine whether there was a risk of double jeopardy on retrial
• after determining that the defendant’s motion for substitution of judge was improperly denied, considering the sufficiency of the evidence in order to determine whether there was a risk of double jeopardy on retrial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).