People v. Saltzman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Section 114-5(a) of the [Code of Criminal Procedure] provides a defendant with an absolute right to a substitution of a judge if the defendant files a timely written motion for substitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Nichols
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2013-11-19· cited 5×
• People v. Tate
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2018-02-02· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Kliner
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1998-12-03· cited 564×
• People v. McDuffee
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1999-09-23· cited 31×
• People v. Pace
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-02-21· cited 26×
• People v. Redisi
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-09-27· cited 15×
• People v. Ryan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-06-29· cited 15×
• People v. Hanson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-12-08· cited 13×
• People v. Craig
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-05-05· cited 4×

Other cases named People v. Saltzman

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• People v. Saltzman
  Criminal Court of the City of New York· 1984-05-31· cited 2×