Skip to main content

People v. Otto

Citations

  • 831 P.2d 1178
  • 2 Cal. 4th 1088
  • 9 Cal. Rptr. 2d 596
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 9617
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6107
  • 1992 Cal. LEXIS 3050

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding in a murder case, improper wire tapping of telephone calls between the victim's wife and her lover, recorded by the victim before his death, required reversal for suppression
  • “a violation of the federal statute renders the illegally obtained evidence inadmissible in state court proceedings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arabian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.