California Supreme Court· 7/9/1992
People v. Otto
Citations
- 831 P.2d 1178
- 2 Cal. 4th 1088
- 9 Cal. Rptr. 2d 596
- 92 Daily Journal DAR 9617
- 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6107
- 1992 Cal. LEXIS 3050
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding in a murder case, improper wire tapping of telephone calls between the victim's wife and her lover, recorded by the victim before his death, required reversal for suppression
- “a violation of the federal statute renders the illegally obtained evidence inadmissible in state court proceedings”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arabian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court· 2016-06-27· cited 1,373×
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2002-08-29· cited 935×
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-01-21· cited 692×
- Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1993-01-28· cited 104×
- Equilon Enterprises, LLC v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2002-08-29· cited 60×
- Fearnow v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-01-11· cited 55×
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-06-07· cited 38×
- Glazner v. GlaznerEleventh Circuit· 2003-10-16· cited 33×
- People v. Interest of A.W.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1999-06-14· cited 31×
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-05-21· cited 31×
- People v. GuzmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 2019-12-05· cited 31×
- People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-11-20· cited 29×
- Clayton v. RichardsTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2001-05-09· cited 26×
- Stewart v. StewartMississippi Supreme Court· 1994-11-17· cited 25×
- People v. LeonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2007-01-25· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. VieuxMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-10-30· cited 25×
- People v. LoydCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-05-06· cited 17×
- Bishop v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-12-15· cited 12×
- Community Development Commission v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-07-05· cited 11×
- State v. TellesSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-01-25· cited 10×
Cites
74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-07-03· cited 7,961×
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court· 1940-05-27· cited 2,271×
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-06-30· cited 1,579×
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 898×
- Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 498×
- United States v. DonovanSupreme Court· 1977-01-18· cited 403×
- United States v. ChavezSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 348×
- United States v. OregonSupreme Court· 1961-05-29· cited 320×
- People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-03-11· cited 314×
- Gemsco, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court· 1945-04-02· cited 276×
- United States v. WinterFirst Circuit· 1981-10-30· cited 194×
- Lee v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 192×
- United States v. William Allan JonesSixth Circuit· 1976-09-30· cited 157×
- United States v. TurkFifth Circuit· 1976-01-29· cited 128×
- Beverly Camp Simpson v. John G. Simpson, IIIFifth Circuit· 1974-04-24· cited 126×
- Turner v. PV International Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1988-12-19· cited 116×
- People v. SiripongsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 96×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.