Illinois Supreme Court· 4/19/2001

People v. Orange

Citations

749 N.E.2d 932
195 Ill. 2d 437
255 Ill. Dec. 450
2001 Ill. LEXIS 476

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that successive petitions may be allowed where proceedings on the initial petition were deficient and noting that the cause-and-prejudice test has been used “as an aid” to determine whether a successive post-conviction petition may proceed
holding that successive petitions may be allowed where proceedings on the initial petition were deficient and noting that the cause-and-prejudice test has been used \as an aid\ to determine whether a successive post-conviction petition may proceed
holding that successive petitions may be allowed where proceedings on the initial petition were deficient and noting that the cause-and-prejudice test has been used “as an aid” to determine whether a successive post-conviction petition may proceed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.