Illinois Supreme Court· 12/19/2002

People v. Johnson

Citations

794 N.E.2d 294
206 Ill. 2d 348
276 Ill. Dec. 399
2002 Ill. LEXIS 1642

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that questions of law are subject to de novo review
standard of review depends in part on “the degree to which the [trial] court must assess credibility, weigh facts, and draw inferences”
“[U]nless there is merit to petitioner’s underlying claim, he can have suffered no prejudice from counsel’s failure to raise it on direct appeal.”
“unless there is merit to petitioner’s underlying claim, he can have suffered no prejudice from counsel’s failure to raise it on direct appeal.”
a defendant is considered to be fit if he understands the nature of the proceedings and can assist in his own defense
a defendant is considered to be fit if he understands the nature of the proceedings and can assist in his own defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garman, Earick, Kilbride

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.