Supreme Court of Colorado· 1/13/1997
People v. O'HEARN
Citations
- 931 P.2d 1168
- 1997 Colo. LEXIS 67
- 1997 WL 9980
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that exigent circumstances did not exist to justify warrantless police entry into defendant’s home
- noting that, among other factors, police must have a “strong reason to believe that the suspect is in the premises being entered” in order to claim exigent circumstances are present
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hobbs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. BosticColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-05-04· cited 313×
- People v. AllisonSupreme Court of Colorado· 2004-03-22· cited 242×
- People v. in the Interest of D.F.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1997-02-18· cited 74×
- Mendez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-09-20· cited 67×
- People v. Mendoza-BalderamaSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-05-24· cited 45×
- People v. LewisSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-03-22· cited 44×
- People v. PadgettSupreme Court of Colorado· 1997-02-24· cited 42×
- People v. KluhsmanSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-03-29· cited 39×
- People v. SchaferSupreme Court of Colorado· 1997-09-15· cited 28×
- People in Interest of RASupreme Court of Colorado· 1997-04-21· cited 19×
- People ex rel. E.G.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2016-04-18· cited 18×
- People v. LeBlancCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-12-19· cited 17×
- People v. GrazierSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-01-18· cited 12×
- People v. ArapuSupreme Court of Colorado· 2012-06-04· cited 10×
- Hanson v. Colorado Department of Revenue, Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Colorado· 2014-06-30· cited 9×
- People v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado· 2008-06-30· cited 8×
- People v. HolmesSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-06-01· cited 7×
- People v. BlackmonColorado Court of Appeals· 2000-10-19· cited 7×
- People v. MendezColorado Court of Appeals· 1997-10-16· cited 5×
- Hanson v. Colo. Dep't of Revenue, Motor Vehicle Div.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2012-08-30· cited 4×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 1,874×
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,715×
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court· 1995-06-26· cited 1,470×
- New York v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 658×
- United States v. Dorothy Ann Knox, (85-5952, 86-5089), Kimberly Lawanda Ware (86-5097), Altamont S. Champegnie (86-5200)Sixth Circuit· 1988-03-30· cited 165×
- People v. BreidenbachSupreme Court of Colorado· 1994-06-13· cited 162×
- People v. DrakeSupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-01-16· cited 97×
- Niles B. Wanger and Shirley Wanger v. Ray Bonner, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Dekalb County, Robert W. McCullough Etc.Fifth Circuit· 1980-09-05· cited 91×
- United States v. Michael Terry CurranNinth Circuit· 1974-05-28· cited 85×
- People v. MorenoSupreme Court of Colorado· 1971-12-13· cited 76×
- People v. TrujilloSupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-01-16· cited 62×
Other cases named People v. O'HEARN
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.