People v. O'CONNOR

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• section 288 not restricted to genital touching

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Scott
  California Supreme Court· 1994-12-30· cited 1,878×
• People v. Levesque
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-05-30· cited 36×
• People v. Self
  California Court of Appeal· 1993-01-27· cited 14×
• People v. Marquez
  California Court of Appeal· 1994-09-27· cited 11×
• State v. Howe
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-07-21· cited 6×
• Scroggins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1998-01-02· cited 3×
• People v. Cadena
  California Court of Appeal· 2019-08-27

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Harrison
  California Supreme Court· 1989-03-20· cited 634×
• People v. Barnes
  California Supreme Court· 1986-07-31· cited 355×
• People v. Gilbert
  California Supreme Court· 1969-12-23· cited 303×
• In Re Williamson
  California Supreme Court· 1954-11-24· cited 244×
• People v. Tassell
  California Supreme Court· 1984-04-20· cited 237×
• People v. Mickle
  California Supreme Court· 1991-08-19· cited 189×
• People v. Pitts
  California Court of Appeal· 1990-09-05· cited 169×
• People v. Jenkins
  California Supreme Court· 1980-12-15· cited 129×
• People v. Brooks
  California Supreme Court· 1980-02-15· cited 78×
• People v. Pahl
  California Court of Appeal· 1991-01-28· cited 64×
• People v. Austin
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-10-10· cited 48×
• People v. Dontanville
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-08-24· cited 28×
• Anderson v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-12-08· cited 21×
• People v. Robertson
  California Court of Appeal· 1990-09-17· cited 20×