California Court of Appeal· 10/10/1980
People v. Austin
Citations
- 111 Cal. App. 3d 110
- 168 Cal. Rptr. 401
- 1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 2298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that there must be touching to violate section 288, but it could be done by the child victim “on its own person providing such touching was at the instigation of a person who had the required specific intent”
- under § 288, defendant “was responsible for the touching and removal of the child’s pants as surely as if he had done it himself’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pierson, Hopper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-12-30· cited 1,878×
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 279×
- People v. MickleCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-08-19· cited 189×
- People v. PittsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-09-05· cited 169×
- People v. CookColorado Court of Appeals· 2008-10-16· cited 111×
- Allstate Insurance v. Kim W.California Court of Appeal· 1984-09-27· cited 79×
- State v. CatanioNevada Supreme Court· 2004-12-29· cited 75×
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-09-23· cited 71×
- Hector Rodriguez-Castellon v. Eric Holder, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2013-10-22· cited 55×
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. TroelstrupSupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-04-09· cited 46×
- People v. MeachamCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-02-22· cited 44×
- State Auto Mutual Insurance v. McIntyre Ex Rel. BuckN.D. Alabama· 1987-01-27· cited 37×
- People v. LevesqueCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-05-30· cited 36×
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-01-18· cited 34×
- Maayeh v. Trinity Lloyds Ins. Co.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1992-12-21· cited 31×
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-12-06· cited 31×
- People v. SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-11-14· cited 27×
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-06-23· cited 26×
- People v. Cruz VillagranCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-11-18· cited 23×
- Commercial Union Insurance Company v. RobertsFifth Circuit· 1993-12-21· cited 22×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pryor v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-09-07· cited 154×
- Beausoliel v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1939-10-16· cited 154×
- Moore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1977-11-30· cited 45×
- People v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1958-03-19· cited 34×
- People v. HobbsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-02-11· cited 29×
- People v. CoontzCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1953-07-21· cited 25×
- People v. HaywoodCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-03-03· cited 25×
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-06-26· cited 24×
- People v. JackCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1965-04-06· cited 24×
- People v. LanhamCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1934-04-09· cited 24×
- People v. OwenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-03-30· cited 23×
- People v. MorelandCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-05-17· cited 22×
- People v. PoundsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-03-18· cited 21×
- People v. AshCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-08-22· cited 20×
- People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-10-03· cited 20×
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-03-16· cited 19×
- People v. WaxmanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-11-26· cited 15×
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1973-01-23· cited 10×
- People v. MoralesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-09-07· cited 9×
- Fritz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1964-09-29· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.