California Supreme Court· 3/20/1989

People v. Harrison

Citations

768 P.2d 1078
48 Cal. 3d 321
256 Cal. Rptr. 401
1989 Cal. LEXIS 667

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

cited with approval in People v. Hicks (1993) 6 Cal.4th 784, 788 [25 Cal. Rptr.2d 469, 863 P.2d 714]
cited with approval in People v. Hicks (1993) 6 Cal.4th 784, 788 [25 Cal.Rptr.2d 469, 863 P.2d 714]
defendant convicted of three digital penetrations of the victim's vagina, even though offenses were committed over a 7 to 10 minute period and the defendant's sole aim was to achieve sexual gratification
each digital penetration committed in course of defendant’s assault upon victim constituted separate violation of statute proscribing such penetrations, for which defendant could be separately convicted
each digital penetration committed in course of defendant's assault upon victim constituted separate violation of statute proscribing such penetrations, for which defendant could be separately convicted
defendant convicted of three digital penetrations of the victim’s vagina, even though offenses were committed over a 7 to 10 minute period and the defendant’s sole aim was to achieve sexual gratification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagleson, Mosk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

204 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Harrison

248 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.