Skip to main content

People v. Moore

Citations

  • 425 N.E.2d 1134
  • 99 Ill. App. 3d 664
  • 54 Ill. Dec. 917
  • 1981 Ill. App. LEXIS 3209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that defense counsel’s statement that defendant was ready for trial constituted a demand for speedy trial where the record showed that the trial court construed the request as a demand for trial and the State failed to object to trial court’s interpretation
  • ruling that defense's counsel's statement that defendant was ready for trial constituted a demand for speedy trial where the record showed that the trial court construed the request as a demand for trial and the State failed to object to trial court's interpretation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.