Illinois Supreme Court· 4/3/2000

People v. Mitchell

Citations

727 N.E.2d 254
189 Ill. 2d 312
245 Ill. Dec. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, because the defendant did not file a pro se petition, his attorneys could not have violated the provision of Rule 651(c
holding that, because the defendant did not file a pro se petition, his attorneys could not have violated the provision of Rule 651(c
holding that a defendant’s ingestion of psychotropic medication, without more, does not give rise to a bona fide doubt of the defendant’s fitness requiring the trial court to order a fitness hearing
stating that the mere ingestion of psychotropic drugs does not create bona fide doubt
holding a trial court’s failure to conduct a fitness hearing under section 104 — 21(a
holding a trial court's failure to conduct a fitness hearing under section 104-21(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rathje, Miller, Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.