Illinois Supreme Court· 12/20/2001

People v. Jackson

Citations

205 Ill. 2d 247
793 N.E.2d 1
275 Ill. Dec. 521
2001 Ill. LEXIS 1783

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“To establish the prejudice prong [under Strickland], defendant must show a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
“To establish the prejudice prong [under Strickland], defendant must show a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding -7- 1-18-0195 would have been different.”
“To establish the prejudice prong [under Strickland], defendant must show a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the - 18 - No. 1-19-1367 proceeding would have been different.”
“Our rules provide that an appellant’s brief must contain ‘[a]rgument, which shall contain contentions of the appellant and the reasons therefor, with citation of the authorities ***’ and ‘[p]oints not argued are waived’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMorrow, Harrison, Kilbride

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

86 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.