California Court of Appeal· 11/17/2003
People v. Martinez
Citations
- 113 Cal. App. 4th 400
- 7 Cal. Rptr. 3d 49
- 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9906
- 2003 Daily Journal DAR 12415
- 2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1701
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a gang expert could testify on “what it meant to be a ‘rat’ in gang culture” because “it was relevant to help understand discrepancies between some of the wit nesses’ statements to the police and their testimony at trial”
- “When a trial court erroneously relies on one hearsay exception to admit evidence that otherwise would have been admissible under a different exception, it cannot be said that the evidence was admitted in error.”
- “When a trial court erroneously relies on one hearsay exception to admit evidence that otherwise would have been admissible under a different exception, it cannot be said that the evidence was admitted in error.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rylaarsdam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. JamesColorado Court of Appeals· 2004-12-16· cited 716×
- People v. SamaniegoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-04-16· cited 368×
- Delgadillo v. WoodfordNinth Circuit· 2008-06-03· cited 208×
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-11-24· cited 162×
- People v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-08-22· cited 26×
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-30· cited 25×
- People v. PeytonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-09-16· cited 15×
- People v. GuzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-12-12· cited 7×
- People v. MunozCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2019-09-06
- People v. TorresCalifornia Supreme Court· 2020-05-04
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1999-06-14· cited 1,183×
- Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1986-06-03· cited 1,066×
- People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-12-30· cited 877×
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-06-01· cited 576×
- People v. OlguinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-12-30· cited 358×
- People v. WaderCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-07-08· cited 260×
- People v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-01-10· cited 199×
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-04-02· cited 155×
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-11-17· cited 143×
- People v. FunesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-03-31· cited 104×
- People v. MezaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-10-12· cited 88×
- People v. RandCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-08-15· cited 32×
- People v. MayfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-02-01· cited 29×
- People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-02-23· cited 29×
- People v. SchmausCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-06-12· cited 11×
- People v. FairCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-08-19· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.