Skip to main content

Jackson v. State

Citations

  • 89 So. 3d 1011
  • 2012 WL 1934426
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8742

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that explaining why the jury should believe a witness is not an improper personal opinion about the credibility of the witness as long as the prosecutor does not suggest that she has reasons to believe the witness that were not presented to the jury
  • reasoning that the prosecutor did not impermissibly vouch for the witness where the prosecutor did not say that the prosecutor believed the witness testified truthfully or otherwise interject her personal opinion
  • stating that “it is improper for an attorney to express a personal opinion as to the credibility of a witness” but that “an attorney is allowed . . . to argue credibility of witnesses or any other relevant issue so long as the argument is based on the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gross, Stevenson, Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.