Skip to main content
· 9/11/1995

People v. Marmon

Citations

  • 903 P.2d 651
  • 19 Brief Times Rptr. 1421
  • 1995 Colo. LEXIS 317
  • 1995 WL 530486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that disbarment of a lawyer is not punishment for double jeopardy purposes
  • “where the respondent has already been punished by the criminal justice system, our aim in determining the level of discipline is not retribution, but the protection of the public”
  • disciplinary sanction is not punishment for double jeopardy purposes; court noted that a contrary conclusion would lead to absurd result that lawyers convicted of criminal offenses could never be disciplined
  • disbarment serves public safety purpose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.