California Supreme Court· 12/18/1995
In Re Brown
Citations
- 906 P.2d 1184
- 12 Cal. 4th 205
- 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 29
- 95 Daily Journal DAR 16769
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9677
- 1995 Cal. LEXIS 7017
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- aim in disciplining lawyers is not punishment or retribution, but is meant to protect public, promote confidence in legal system, and maintain high profes sional standards
- disciplinary action does not take the form of traditional criminal sanctions, but rather consists of reproval, suspension from the practice of law, or disbarment; thus, double jeopardy did not bar disciplinary action that followed lawyer's nolo contendere plea in criminal case
- sixty-day suspension, two year probation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Rose VCalifornia Supreme Court· 2000-03-06· cited 58×
- Matter of Discipline of BabilisUtah Supreme Court· 1997-12-12· cited 40×
- In the Matter of Gwen G. CaranchiniEighth Circuit· 1998-11-04· cited 18×
- People v. DamonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-12-18· cited 16×
- In Re LesanskyCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-03-28· cited 13×
- In Re ChastainSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-05-15· cited 12×
- In re LesanskyCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-03-01· cited 6×
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. MorrisSupreme Court of Iowa· 2000-01-20· cited 5×
- In Re SilvertonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-06-23· cited 2×
- Setliff Bros. Serv. v. Bureau of Auto. RepairCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-02-27· cited 1×
- In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against WaechterWashington Supreme Court· 2018-06-14· cited 1×
- In re Caranchini v.Eighth Circuit· 1998-11-04
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 1,050×
- In Re FaheyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1973-02-13· cited 81×
- People v. BelcherCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-03-28· cited 80×
- Baker v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-11-20· cited 47×
- In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-01-30· cited 33×
- Kapelus v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court· 1987-12-10· cited 32×
- In Re FordCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 32×
- In Re RohanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-05-03· cited 29×
- In Re KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-12-31· cited 26×
- People v. MarmonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1995-09-11· cited 26×
- Rose v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-10-05· cited 25×
- Van Sloten v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 21×
- In Re BillingsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-03-19· cited 19×
- In Re MorseCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-09-01· cited 17×
- Brockway v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-03-18· cited 16×
- Edwards v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-12-20· cited 15×
- In Re NaneyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-07-09· cited 15×
- Hawkins v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-03-14· cited 14×
- In Re CrooksCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-12-06· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.