Supreme Court of Colorado· 1/16/2001
In re Price
Citations
- 18 P.3d 185
- 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 436
- 2001 Colo. LEXIS 19
- 2001 WL 32800
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that where a petitioner had not proved his compliance with disciplinary orders, it was not strictly necessary for the hearing board to discuss his fitness to practice and rehabilitation
- noting that disciplinary proceedings are not punishment, nor are reinstatement proceedings intended as discipline
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Miranda v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2012-04-17· cited 2×
- Kline v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2016-01-05· cited 1×
- Price v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2002-11-22
- Essling v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2014-02-28
- Price v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2015-12-09
- Christman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2016-02-10
- Falco v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2018-03-06
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. KleinSupreme Court of Colorado· 1988-06-20· cited 47×
- People v. MarmonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1995-09-11· cited 26×
- People v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado· 1994-12-19· cited 20×
- In Re QuiatSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-04-26· cited 15×
- In Re C De BacaSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-09-11· cited 11×
- People v. PriceSupreme Court of Colorado· 1996-12-16· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.