California Court of Appeal· 6/23/1977

People v. Manson

Citations

71 Cal. App. 3d 1
139 Cal. Rptr. 275
71 Cal. App. 2d 1
1977 Cal. App. LEXIS 1587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

extending tax privilege to W-2 forms because the forms “are required 22 to be attached to a taxpayer’s state and federal income tax returns [and] constitute an 23 integral part of the return”
in light of defendant’s ongoing \disruptive conduct\ the trial court correctly denied his repeated requests to represent himself at trial
“The fact that a murderer may successfully dispose of the body of the victim does not entitle him to an acquittal. That is one form of success for which society has no reward.”
\The fact that a murderer may successfully dispose of the body of the victim does not entitle him to an acquittal. That is one form of success for which society has no reward.\
prosecution witness testified that she had heard specific individual scream; defendant sought to set up “screaming line-up” to prove that witness could not have identified voice under the circum stances as she testified; evidence excluded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loring

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

94 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.