California Court of Appeal· 2/7/1977
People v. MacK
Citations
- 66 Cal. App. 3d 839
- 136 Cal. Rptr. 283
- 1977 Cal. App. LEXIS 1183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “There is nothing inherent in the process of determining probable cause that renders it beyond the capacity of lay persons to resolve.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Puglia, Paras, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-09-08· cited 172×
- People v. McGaughranCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-10-25· cited 115×
- People v. TobinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-04-12· cited 57×
- People v. CornejoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-05-02· cited 30×
- People v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-02-05· cited 20×
- James v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-12-29· cited 18×
- People v. LeBlancCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-12-19· cited 17×
- People v. BurciagoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-05-08· cited 13×
- People v. Superior Court (Quinn)California Court of Appeal· 1978-08-07· cited 10×
- People v. MastinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-02-17· cited 10×
- People v. FranklinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1985-08-26· cited 9×
- People v. DominguezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-05-17· cited 8×
- Caligari v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-10-15· cited 7×
- People v. McNabbCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-02-19· cited 7×
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-07-28· cited 4×
- People v. EnriquezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-06-15· cited 1×
- L.A. County Metropolitan Transportation Auth. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-09-13
Cites
60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,797×
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 3,189×
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-03-22· cited 2,916×
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-12-12· cited 2,107×
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-12-19· cited 1,793×
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 1,382×
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 1,155×
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-01-09· cited 885×
- Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court· 1925-04-13· cited 727×
- People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-04-27· cited 640×
- People v. RameyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-02-25· cited 416×
- People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-01-19· cited 415×
- Shadwick v. City of TampaSupreme Court· 1972-06-19· cited 379×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.