Illinois Supreme Court· 11/30/1984

People v. MacK

Citations

473 N.E.2d 880
105 Ill. 2d 103
85 Ill. Dec. 281
1984 Ill. LEXIS 404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding defendant could not be convicted of two counts of armed robbery where there was but one taking of money
distinguishing Butler and Thomas because “[i]n those cases there were multiple takings from multiple victims”
distinguishing Butler and Thomas because “[i]n those cases there were multiple takings from multiple victims”
noting Duszkewycz but concluding that its analysis was unhelpful: “the penalty provided by the legislature gives us no help in making the determination as to which of the three murder charges is the most serious because the penalty for all three may be death”
noting Duszkewycz but concluding that its analysis was unhelpful: \the penalty provided by the legislature gives us no help in making the determination as to which of the three murder charges is the most serious because the penalty for all three may be death\
where the single act/single crime rule is violated, both the offending conviction and its sentence are vacated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan, Clark, Simon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.