Michigan Court of Appeals· 6/6/1988
People v. Loyer
Citations
- 425 N.W.2d 714
- 169 Mich. App. 105
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding unconstitutional statute requiring disclosure to State of witness' names and expected testimony in order for indigent defendant to obtain payment of subpoena and witness fees
- holding unconstitutional statute requiring disclosure to State of witness’ names and expected testimony in order for indigent defendant to obtain payment of subpoena and witness fees
- Statute declared unconstitutional which required indigent defendants to disclose the names, addresses, and expected testimony of witnesses in the presence of the prosecution in order to obtain payment for service of process and witness fees
- Statute declared unconstitutional which required indigent defendants to disclose the names, addresses, and expected testimony of witnesses in the presence of the prosecution in order to obtain payment for service of process and witness fees
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wahls, Maher, Boyle, Mahek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-10-15· cited 716×
- People v. KnappMichigan Court of Appeals· 2001-03-22· cited 254×
- Bush v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-03-08· cited 196×
- People v. LuethMichigan Court of Appeals· 2003-02-04· cited 194×
- People v. CanterMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-12-21· cited 136×
- Thorson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1994-12-08· cited 122×
- State v. BarnettTennessee Supreme Court· 1995-11-13· cited 98×
- Ex Parte MoodySupreme Court of Alabama· 1996-09-27· cited 77×
- State v. TouchetSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1994-09-30· cited 66×
- People v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1999-01-08· cited 54×
- People v. McFallMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-10-08· cited 54×
- People v. McIntireMichigan Court of Appeals· 1999-01-08· cited 49×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-14· cited 45×
- People v. YeomanMichigan Court of Appeals· 1996-10-15· cited 37×
- People v. WalkerMichigan Court of Appeals· 2007-11-27· cited 22×
- People v. ReddishMichigan Court of Appeals· 1989-08-10· cited 20×
- Addison v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-08· cited 10×
- People v. NealMichigan Supreme Court· 1998-12-15· cited 5×
- People v. BabickMichigan Supreme Court· 2000-07-21· cited 5×
- People v. BassMichigan Supreme Court· 1998-05-06· cited 3×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1985-02-26· cited 3,332×
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 3,330×
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 2,033×
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1988-03-28· cited 1,952×
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1983-05-24· cited 1,941×
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,740×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,488×
- Betts v. BradySupreme Court· 1942-06-01· cited 1,154×
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 1,061×
- United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court· 1976-06-10· cited 635×
- United States v. DoeSupreme Court· 1984-02-28· cited 623×
- People v. BuckeyMichigan Supreme Court· 1985-12-04· cited 139×
- United States v. KahanSupreme Court· 1974-02-25· cited 126×
- People v. HernandezMichigan Court of Appeals· 1968-12-23· cited 58×
- People v. MaranianMichigan Supreme Court· 1960-04-11· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.