Skip to main content

People v. Loyer

Citations

  • 425 N.W.2d 714
  • 169 Mich. App. 105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding unconstitutional statute requiring disclosure to State of witness' names and expected testimony in order for indigent defendant to obtain payment of subpoena and witness fees
  • holding unconstitutional statute requiring disclosure to State of witness’ names and expected testimony in order for indigent defendant to obtain payment of subpoena and witness fees
  • Statute declared unconstitutional which required indigent defendants to disclose the names, addresses, and expected testimony of witnesses in the presence of the prosecution in order to obtain payment for service of process and witness fees
  • Statute declared unconstitutional which required indigent defendants to disclose the names, addresses, and expected testimony of witnesses in the presence of the prosecution in order to obtain payment for service of process and witness fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wahls, Maher, Boyle, Mahek

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.