California Court of Appeal· 12/22/1997
People v. Loeun
Citations
- 17 Cal. 4th 1
- 947 P.2d 1313
- 69 Cal. Rptr. 2d 776
- 97 Daily Journal DAR 15325
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9562
- 1997 Cal. LEXIS 8341
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The Legislature’s use of the present tense ‘engage in’ indicates its intent that instances of current criminal conduct can satisfy the statutory requirement for a ‘pattern of criminal gang activity.’”
- “The amount set as liquidated damages must represent the result of < 2 ||reasonable endeavor by the parties to estimate a fair average compensation for any loss thai 3 ||may be sustained.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
146 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2001-08-06· cited 637×
- People v. DelozaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-07-09· cited 389×
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-01-23· cited 358×
- Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2003-08-20· cited 324×
- People v. PruntyCalifornia Supreme Court· 2015-08-27· cited 319×
- People v. SengpadychithCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-10-17· cited 315×
- People v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 273×
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2015-07-02· cited 249×
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-03-26· cited 196×
- People v. Quang Minh TranCalifornia Supreme Court· 2011-06-13· cited 194×
- People v. DuranCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-04-30· cited 194×
- People v. CastenadaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2000-07-13· cited 172×
- People v. KillebrewCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-11-08· cited 168×
- People v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court· 2000-10-03· cited 162×
- Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2014-08-07· cited 155×
- People v. VillalobosCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-11-30· cited 137×
- People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2021-07-01· cited 135×
- People v. FrancoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-12-22· cited 119×
- People v. ShabazzCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-03-27· cited 104×
- People v. RoblesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2000-08-14· cited 102×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1965-12-23· cited 2,432×
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1992-03-24· cited 1,422×
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-12-23· cited 783×
- Scales v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 526×
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-04-06· cited 496×
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-01-02· cited 391×
- DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1992-05-04· cited 338×
- Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-04-04· cited 239×
- White v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 194×
- Lennane v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-12-28· cited 129×
- Mercer v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-05-06· cited 112×
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-05-16· cited 68×
- People v. Nathaniel C.California Court of Appeal· 1991-03-22· cited 60×
- Martin v. City of AlbanyOregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-29· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.