California Court of Appeal· 8/14/2000
People v. King
Citations
- 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 220
- 82 Cal. App. 4th 1363
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6806
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 8999
- 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 640
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that DNA profiling, which led to the defendant’s convictions in the present case, did not violate the Fourth Amendment
- stating that “[s]peedy identification and apprehension of an offender, therefore, will prevent crime even if DNA testing has no deterrent effect”
- stating that “[s]peedy identification and apprehension of an offender, therefore, will prevent crime even if DNA testing has no deterrent effect”
- stating that “[s]peedy identification and apprehension of an offender, therefore, will prevent crime even if DNA testing has no deterrent effect”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hamilton v. BrownNinth Circuit· 2011-01-04· cited 282×
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2010-01-25· cited 114×
- Alfaro v. TerhuneCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-05-16· cited 51×
- In re D.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2003-12-18· cited 39×
- People v. TravisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-05-26· cited 38×
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-11-26· cited 28×
- State v. MartinezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-10-31· cited 25×
- Polston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-01-20· cited 23×
- People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-02-05· cited 23×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-05-02· cited 21×
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-05-25· cited 21×
- Haskell v. BrownN.D. California· 2009-12-23· cited 16×
- People v. Calvin S.California Court of Appeal· 2007-05-30· cited 15×
- People v. McCrayCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-10-26· cited 11×
- Herman v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2006-02-23· cited 10×
- People v. DialCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-06-06· cited 4×
- People v. ValenciaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 2015-09-29· cited 4×
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-10-26· cited 1×
- State v. Lonnie TurnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-12-12
- In Re DLCCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2003-12-18
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 11,438×
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 8,014×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court· 1985-01-15· cited 2,391×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 2,149×
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court· 1995-06-26· cited 1,470×
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court· 1990-06-14· cited 1,275×
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 1,188×
- Jones v. MurrayFourth Circuit· 1992-04-07· cited 239×
- State v. OlivasWashington Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 98×
- Roe v. MarcotteSecond Circuit· 1999-09-16· cited 86×
- Landry v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-04-13· cited 57×
- People v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-08-23· cited 48×
- People v. WealerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-06-29· cited 48×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.