Skip to main content

People v. Broden

Citations

  • 408 N.W.2d 789
  • 428 Mich. 343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[c]onceivably, even a sentence within the sentencing guidelines could be an abuse of discretion in unusual circumstances”
  • involving a challenge under GCR 1963, 785.7(1)(b)3 to a 2 Under MCL 750.73(3
  • “[A]mong the proper criteria for determining an appropriate sentence are: (1) the disciplining of the wrongdoer, (2) the protection of society, (3) the potential for reformation of the offender, and (4) the deterring of others from committing like offenses.”
  • “[A]mong the proper criteria for determining an appropriate sentence are: (1) the disciplining of the wrongdoer, (2) the protection of society, (3) the potential for reformation of the offender, and (4) the deterring of others from committing like offenses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Levin, Brickley, Cavanagh, Boyle, Archer, Griffin, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Broden

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.