Skip to main content

People v. Morris

Citations

  • 925 N.E.2d 1069
  • 236 Ill. 2d 345
  • 338 Ill. Dec. 863
  • 2010 Ill. LEXIS 9

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Evans held that under principles of contract, both the State and defendant are bound to the terms of a plea agreement
  • observing that “since Teague, the United States Supreme Court has rejected every claim brought before it alleging that a new rule satisfies the requirements for watershed status”
  • noting that Evans held that under principles of contract, both the State and defendant are bound to the terms of a plea agreement
  • observing that “since Teague, the United States Supreme Court has rejected every claim brought before it alleging that a new rule satisfies the requirements for watershed status”
  • “a petition alleging nonfactual and nonspecific assertions that merely amount to conclusions will not survive summary dismissal under the Act”
  • “[A] petition alleging nonfactual and nonspecific assertions that merely amount to conclusions will not survive summary dismissal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

95 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.