Skip to main content

People v. Johnson

Citations

  • 518 N.E.2d 100
  • 119 Ill. 2d 119
  • 115 Ill. Dec. 575
  • 1987 Ill. LEXIS 277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the prosecutor’s characterization of the defendant as an “animal” was improper but ultimately not prejudicial
  • holding that the admonishment the defendant received substantially complied with the rule despite the trial court incorrectly informing the defendant under Rule 401(a) that the minimum sentence was a “number of years” when it was actually natural life in prison
  • finding substantial compliance in part because defendant was “no stranger to criminal proceedings”
  • waiver of counsel valid despite trial court’s failure to advise defendant that he faced a mandatory minimum sentence of life imprisonment
  • prosecutor described the victims as having been “ ‘butchered by an animal, and that animal is among us today, and he sits right there’ ”
  • improper to characterize the defendant as an “animal” during closing argument even when characterization was based on evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moran, Simon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

100 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.