Illinois Supreme Court· 2/19/1999
People v. Williams
Citations
- 186 Ill. 2d 55
- 237 Ill. Dec. 112
- 708 N.E.2d 1152
- 1999 Ill. LEXIS 14
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that - 19 - Rule 651(c) requires counsel to provide a reasonable level of assistance in postconviction proceedings
- providing that filing of Rule 651(c) certificate is not necessary if the record adequately reflects that postconviction counsel otherwise complied with the rule
- holding, postconviction counsel “clearly had no obligation to seek out a blood-type expert”
- stating that the failure to file a proper affidavit certifying compliance with Rule 651(c) is harmless if the record demonstrates that counsel adequately fulfilled his or her duties, as the filing rule is not a rule of strict compliance
- stating that the failure to file a proper affidavit certifying compliance with Rule 651(c) is harmless if the record demonstrates that counsel adequately fulfilled his or her duties, as the filing rule is not a rule of strict compliance
- it is not postconviction counsel’s duty to seek out experts to support a petitioner’s claims or to “conduct a fishing expedition” to find supporting evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heiple, Rathje, Freeman, Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. EnisIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-11-22· cited 377×
- People v. SimmsIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-08-10· cited 336×
- People v. HaynesIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-07-06· cited 185×
- People v. BarrowIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-01-29· cited 185×
- People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-05-24· cited 172×
- People v. SimpsonIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-09-27· cited 146×
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court· 2002-10-18· cited 141×
- People v. LanderIllinois Supreme Court· 2005-06-03· cited 137×
- People v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-12-20· cited 116×
- People v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-04-03· cited 103×
- People v. MunsonIllinois Supreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 100×
- People v. HickeyIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-09-27· cited 86×
- People v. WilbornAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-09-23· cited 82×
- John Szabo v. Jonathan R. Walls, Warden, Menard Correctional CenterSeventh Circuit· 2003-01-24· cited 76×
- People v. McNealIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-10-13· cited 69×
- People v. UrzuaIllinois Supreme Court· 2023-06-15· cited 59×
- People v. WaldropAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-11-10· cited 53×
- People v. MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-06-15· cited 39×
- People v. KirkAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-09-24· cited 38×
- People v. KirkpatrickAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-04-17· cited 32×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 3,807×
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-10-01· cited 1,609×
- People v. BullIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-11-10· cited 417×
- People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1993-02-18· cited 304×
- People v. GriffinIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-09-11· cited 258×
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-05-31· cited 252×
- People v. OwensIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-11-30· cited 219×
- People v. OrangeIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-11-22· cited 195×
- People v. RuizIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-10-25· cited 147×
- People v. ThompkinsIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 146×
- People v. FranklinIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-06-22· cited 132×
- People v. EricksonIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-06-18· cited 91×
- Scott v. Dime Savings Bank of New YorkSupreme Court· 1997-03-17· cited 78×
- People v. SzaboIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-10-17· cited 61×
- People v. EmersonIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-11-19· cited 37×
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1997-03-17· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.