Skip to main content

People v. Williams

Citations

  • 186 Ill. 2d 55
  • 237 Ill. Dec. 112
  • 708 N.E.2d 1152
  • 1999 Ill. LEXIS 14

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that - 19 - Rule 651(c) requires counsel to provide a reasonable level of assistance in postconviction proceedings
  • providing that filing of Rule 651(c) certificate is not necessary if the record adequately reflects that postconviction counsel otherwise complied with the rule
  • holding, postconviction counsel “clearly had no obligation to seek out a blood-type expert”
  • stating that the failure to file a proper affidavit certifying compliance with Rule 651(c) is harmless if the record demonstrates that counsel adequately fulfilled his or her duties, as the filing rule is not a rule of strict compliance
  • stating that the failure to file a proper affidavit certifying compliance with Rule 651(c) is harmless if the record demonstrates that counsel adequately fulfilled his or her duties, as the filing rule is not a rule of strict compliance
  • it is not postconviction counsel’s duty to seek out experts to support a petitioner’s claims or to “conduct a fishing expedition” to find supporting evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heiple, Rathje, Freeman, Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.