Skip to main content

People v. Jackson

Citations

  • 495 N.E.2d 1207
  • 145 Ill. App. 3d 626
  • 99 Ill. Dec. 472
  • 1986 Ill. App. LEXIS 2521

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that generally expert witnesses are qualified if, because of their skill, training or experience, they are better able to form an accurate opinion concerning the matter at issue than is an average layperson
  • observing that, as a matter of practicality, such information gathering is likely the only means a non-gang member can collect details of gang activity and membership rank and that such data is not available to an average layperson
  • noting that generally expert witnesses are qualified if, because of their skill, training or experience, they are better able to form an accurate opinion concerning the matter at issue than is an average layperson
  • observing that, as a matter of practicality, such information gathering is likely the only means by which a nongang member can collect details of gang activity and membership rank and that such data is not available to an average layperson
  • gang specialist with five years’ experience in investigation of gangs in the area held qualified as expert
  • gang specialist with five years’ experience in investigation of gangs in the area held qualified as expert

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.