Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/31/1990
People v. Ayala
Citations
- 567 N.E.2d 450
- 208 Ill. App. 3d 586
- 153 Ill. Dec. 492
- 1990 Ill. App. LEXIS 1984
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that evidence that the victims were in territory claimed by two rival gangs was relevant and admissible to prove motive for a seemingly inexplicable attack
- holding qualified as expert a gang crimes specialist with two years’ experience in neighborhood where crime occurred
- holding qualified as expert a gang crimes specialist with two years’ experience in neighborhood where crime occurred
- holding qualified as expert a gang crimes specialist with two years experience in neighborhood where crime occurred
- holding qualified as expert a gang crimes specialist with two years' experience in neighborhood where crime occurred
- discussing police testimony about gang activity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scariano
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Utz v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-10-20· cited 57×
- People v. CliftonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2001-04-24· cited 39×
- People v. CarsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-11-12· cited 33×
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-09-06· cited 32×
- People v. MurrayAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-09-17· cited 29×
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-06-07· cited 21×
- People v. ParsonsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-12-06· cited 21×
- People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-11-06· cited 19×
- People v. ZarateAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-05-31· cited 19×
- People v. SuarezAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-09-17· cited 15×
- People v. Dajuan BanksAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-03-30· cited 14×
- People v. LangfordAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-06-29· cited 13×
- People v. MayesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-12-17· cited 12×
- People v. HamiltonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-02-20· cited 11×
- People v. LoeraAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-08-30· cited 10×
- People v. McMillenAppellate Court of Illinois· 1996-06-04· cited 8×
- People v. CliftonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-08-04· cited 6×
- State v. CristobalCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2012-07-06· cited 5×
- People v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-05-05· cited 3×
- People v. ChoeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-05-26· cited 1×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-03-25· cited 3,599×
- People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court· 1988-02-11· cited 3,273×
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1967-04-24· cited 1,521×
- People v. KingIllinois Supreme Court· 1977-05-20· cited 1,292×
- People v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 643×
- The People v. HairstonIllinois Supreme Court· 1970-09-29· cited 411×
- People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-04-20· cited 223×
- People v. FieldsIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-02-16· cited 158×
- Brown v. Decatur Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court· 1980-12-01· cited 152×
- People of Illinois v. MyersIllinois Supreme Court· 1981-06-04· cited 149×
- The People v. StrongIllinois Supreme Court· 1961-01-20· cited 106×
- People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-06-27· cited 95×
- People v. ParteeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-07-21· cited 86×
- People v. RiveraAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-06-17· cited 48×
- People v. BaityAppellate Court of Illinois· 1984-06-19· cited 40×
- People v. OlmosAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-12-12· cited 38×
- People v. PensonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-04-27· cited 38×
- People v. WolfeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1983-05-20· cited 33×
- People v. ScottAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-02-13· cited 32×
- People v. DouglasAppellate Court of Illinois· 1989-06-14· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.