Skip to main content

People v. Ingram

Citations

  • 946 N.E.2d 1058
  • 409 Ill. App. 3d 1
  • 349 Ill. Dec. 562
  • 2011 Ill. App. LEXIS 284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no error when “contrary to [the] defendant’s claim, the responses of the challenged venire members, as well as the remaining venire members, demonstrate they were not intimidated by the judge’s comments”
  • trial court complied with Rule 431(b) when it asked prospective jurors if they had “ ‘any difficulty or quarrel’ ” with the principles
  • where the trial court stated: “[Y]ou as jurors can draw no inference [from] the fact she chooses to remain silent in favor of [defendant] or against [defendant] if she chooses to remain silent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garcia, Lampkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.