People v. Ware

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In order to preserve the issue for appeal, defendant was required to raise the issue by objecting at trial and in a posttrial motion.”
• by failing to raise it in his posttrial motion, the defendant forfeited his claim that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his request for standby counsel
• the trial court substantially complied with Rule 401(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Donegan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-06-26· cited 47×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-09-28· cited 43×
• People v. Ellison
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2013-03-28· cited 33×
• People v. Kirkpatrick
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-04-17· cited 32×
• People v. Washington
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2016-11-30· cited 29×
• People v. Moore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2023-02-22· cited 28×
• People v. Kidd
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-05-01· cited 20×
• People v. Moore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-09-05· cited 17×
• People v. Ingram
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-03-31· cited 13×
• People v. Peters
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-08-22· cited 8×
• People v. O'Donnell
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-03-11· cited 7×
• People v. Jones
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-07-21· cited 7×
• People v. Gashi
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-06-02· cited 2×
• National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-4 v. Phelps
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2025-09-19· cited 2×