Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/31/2009

People v. Tatum

Citations

906 N.E.2d 695
389 Ill. App. 3d 656
329 Ill. Dec. 497
2009 Ill. App. LEXIS 214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining Edwards does not impose “a higher standard of competence requiring an additional inquiry before a trial court [may] permit[ ] a defendant to proceed pro se”
finding no error where the prosecutor stated that the defendant was manipulating the proceeding by his self-representation and the record showed the defendant was disruptive and disrespectful during the trial
finding it improper for the defendant to cite to an unpublished Rule 23 order
Edwards does not impose “a higher standard of competence requiring an additional inquiry before a trial court [may] permit[] a defendant to proceed pro se”
evidence of contempt is sufficient where defendant’s repeated interruptions were not legitimate objections and were intended to hinder and obstruct the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Karnezis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.