People v. Huntley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mere fact that court order is erroneous is not a defense to contempt charge for violating the order
• an order is considered void if the trial court did not have jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter or if it did not have power to enter the order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rexford Rand Corporation v. Gregory Ancel
  Seventh Circuit· 1995-06-30· cited 101×
• Jenner v. Wissore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-01-05· cited 32×
• Guertin v. Guertin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-10-12· cited 32×
• In Re Marriage of Santa Cruz
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-02-07· cited 23×
• People v. Coleman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-10-13· cited 16×
• People v. Buckley
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-12-29· cited 16×
• In Re Marriage of Page
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-11-10· cited 9×
• People v. Draves
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-11-18· cited 9×
• Dahlen v. Dahlen
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-09-30· cited 7×
• In re Estate of Steinfeld
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-07-10· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Horton
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-11-15· cited 63×
• People Ex Rel. Fisher v. Carey
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1979-10-19· cited 53×
• People v. Stinger
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-10-03· cited 23×
• City of Chicago v. King
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1967-08-31· cited 12×
• People v. Elbus
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-07-05· cited 6×