Michigan Supreme Court· 9/27/1989
People v. Hill
Citations
- 446 N.W.2d 140
- 433 Mich. 464
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating, “a defendant has constructive possession of a firearm if the location of the weapon is known and it is reasonably accessible to the defendant”
- one who possesses only components can be convicted of possession of short-barreled shotgun if shotgun could be reassembled and made operable within reasonable period of time
- “[A] defendant has constructive possession of a firearm if the location of the weapon is known and it is reasonably accessible to the defendant.”
- “[A] defendant has constructive possession of a firearm if the location of the weapon is known and it is reasonably accessible to the defendant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Levin, Brickley, Boyle, Griffin, Riley, Cavanagh, Archer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. StricklandMichigan Court of Appeals· 2011-07-28· cited 183×
- People v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals· 2011-06-14· cited 168×
- People v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court· 2001-01-30· cited 148×
- People v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court· 2002-07-09· cited 132×
- People v. Flick; People v. LazarusMichigan Supreme Court· 2010-07-27· cited 131×
- People v. MarchMichigan Supreme Court· 2016-06-23· cited 108×
- People v. JusticeMichigan Supreme Court· 1997-05-16· cited 104×
- People v. SeewaldMichigan Supreme Court· 2016-04-25· cited 91×
- People v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals· 1998-06-29· cited 88×
- People v. BurgenmeyerMichigan Supreme Court· 2000-03-07· cited 88×
- Parker v. RenicoSixth Circuit· 2007-10-17· cited 85×
- People v. GratschMichigan Court of Appeals· 2013-02-28· cited 78×
- People v. DanielsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-01-29· cited 63×
- People v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court· 1990-08-29· cited 62×
- People v. QuinnMichigan Supreme Court· 1992-07-14· cited 60×
- People v. HudsonMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-08-29· cited 56×
- People v. EtheridgeMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-09-09· cited 55×
- People v. CottonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1991-10-07· cited 54×
- People v. FlowersMichigan Court of Appeals· 1991-09-03· cited 52×
- People v. PealsMichigan Supreme Court· 2006-07-31· cited 46×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. DossMichigan Supreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 136×
- People v. TalleyMichigan Supreme Court· 1981-02-23· cited 127×
- People v. HallMichigan Supreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 125×
- White v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court· 1979-07-24· cited 106×
- People v. KingMichigan Supreme Court· 1981-11-23· cited 56×
- People v. ParkerMichigan Supreme Court· 1983-10-24· cited 33×
- People v. JiminezMichigan Court of Appeals· 1970-10-30· cited 28×
- People v. DavisMichigan Court of Appeals· 1980-10-24· cited 22×
- People v. BoswellMichigan Court of Appeals· 1980-01-10· cited 21×
- People v. TerryMichigan Court of Appeals· 1983-04-06· cited 20×
- People v. PoindexterMichigan Court of Appeals· 1984-10-15· cited 19×
- People v. GibsonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1979-12-05· cited 19×
- People v. WilliamsonMichigan Supreme Court· 1918-03-27· cited 19×
- People v. JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1981-07-09· cited 18×
- People v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals· 1968-04-02· cited 17×
- People v. BrooksMichigan Court of Appeals· 1984-06-05· cited 15×
- People v. CoonsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-02-24· cited 14×
- People v. GarrettMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-07-20· cited 14×
- People v. SanchezMichigan Court of Appeals· 1980-07-02· cited 11×
- Ross v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court· 1958-06-11· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.