Michigan Court of Appeals· 6/29/1998

People v. Green

Citations

580 N.W.2d 444
228 Mich. App. 684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a party “should not be allowed to assign error on appeal to something his own counsel deemed proper at trial”
holding that the defendant’s felon-in-possession charge did not violate his right to bear arms under the Michigan Constitution
holding that the defendant’s felon-in-possession charge did not violate his right to bear arms under the Michigan Constitution
stating that “a well-tried, vigorously argued case should not be overturned on the basis of a few isolated improper remarks that could have been corrected had an objection been lodged”
defining the judicially created element of asportation for use in the kidnapping statute
“presence” requirement of carjacking statute, as adopted from presence definition applied in armed robbery, fulfilled even though victims not removed from the vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sawyer, Wahls, Reilly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.