People v. Sanchez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the distinction between unloaded and inoperable firearms to be \meaningless\ and holding an inoperable firearm may be a \pistol\ within the meaning of the statute
• finding the distinction between unloaded and inoperable firearms to be \meaningless” and holding an inoperable firearm may be a \pistol” within the meaning of the statute
• the distinction between unloaded and inoperable firearms is meaningless
• any distinction between an unloaded and an inoperable firearm is meaningless: therefore, since an unloaded handgun has been held to be a pistol within the meaning of a statute proscribing carrying a concealed pistol, an inoperable handgun is also a pistol under that statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Hill
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1989-09-27· cited 153×
• People v. Thompson
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-05-06· cited 16×
• People v. Huizenga
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-05-01· cited 12×
• People v. Gardner
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1992-07-06· cited 8×
• In Re Vaughn
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1987-05-01· cited 6×
• People v. Vigil
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1988-07-18· cited 5×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Jiminez
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1970-10-30· cited 28×
• People v. Clark
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1970-02-06· cited 22×
• People v. Gogak
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1919-04-03· cited 20×
• People v. Williamson
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1918-03-27· cited 19×
• People v. Bailey
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1968-04-02· cited 17×
• Harmon v. Parker
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1916-12-21· cited 9×
• People v. Stevens
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1979-09-19· cited 6×
• People v. Piggee
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1970-10-27· cited 3×